e;

harvard debate

Posted Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 10:17PM by Eric Richardson

I just watched/listened to the Lessig vs. Valenti debate from Harvard last year. Interesting, but it left me more unfulfilled than anything. Jack Valenti didn't really debate. To paraphrase Lessig, when you give an answer, you have to give a reason. Jack Valenti didn't give reasons. When asked why something was right, he'd say that it was right because the courts said so, or the current law says so. I know what the law says. I know what the courts have said. I don't agree. I think the DMCA is unconstitutional. I want to know why this should be the law.


Perhaps tomorrow will be a different story, but I doubt it. If nothing else, hopefully the Napster case won't be involved. The DMCA repercussions and repercussions of the deCSS case are far more fundamental than those of Napster.


Comments —



Eric Richardson lives in Los Angeles, California, and is generally interested in the intersection between technology, community and news.

He started blogdowntown, an online news site for Downtown Los Angeles, and today works in digital media for Southern California Public Radio.



On This Date